The subsequent great peripherals war is being waged over your ears. After every company on the planet put out a gaming mouse and then a mechanical keyboard, now it’s time for headsets. So gaming headphone.
We realize you don’t wish to scroll through each and every headset review when all you need is an easy answer: “What’s the very best gaming headset I will buy with my hard-earned dollars?” This web site supports the answer you seek, regardless of what your budget is.
We’ll keep updating our recommendations when we take a look at new services and look for stronger contenders. With this latest update, we’ve reviewed several fancypants models, namely the Sennheiser Game Zero and and Sennheiser GSP 350, as well as the Audio-Technica ATH-AG1X. For further earthly budgets, we’ve also tested the SteelSeries Arctis 7, the HyperX Cloud Revolver S, along with the Logitech G533, which debuts as our new best mid-range wireless headset.
Kingston doesn’t have the same pedigree within the headset space as its competitors, but the HyperX Cloud is actually a winning device at the cheap price.
Our 2016 headset recommendation remains pretty much just like our 2015 headset recommendation (and our 2014, as an example): The Kingston HyperX Cloud. Or, if you’re feeling a little fancier, the Cloud II. It’s comfortable, it appears great, and (on top of that) it’s comparatively cheap. What else could you want in a headset?
True to its name, the HyperX Cloud is among the most comfortable headsets out there. It’s hefty, having a solid-metal construction that belies its cheap price, but sits feather-light about the head. The faux-leather earpieces are generously padded, oversized, and form a good seal without squeezing way too hard.
And yes it sounds excellent. As mentioned in our review, this isn’t a studio-quality list of headphones. It’s got the common gaming-centric bass boost plus a slick high-end, but both of them are subtle enough that this HyperX Cloud competes favorably with bluetooth headset twice its price. There’s no Kingston-provided way to adjust the sound, provided that the HyperX Cloud connects through standard 3.5mm jacks, but you honestly shouldn’t have to tweak it in any way from the box. It appears pretty damn great.
Really the only negative thing is the microphone. It’s very flexible, that i appreciate, but has a propensity to pick up background noise and plosives while leaving your voice nasally and hollow.
The slightly-more-expensive HyperX Cloud II is, I do believe, more a lateral move than an improvement over its predecessor. It swaps the 3.5mm connection for a 7.1-ready USB soundcard with better in-line controls and a bit of noise cancellation about the microphone, however you wouldn’t notice a huge distinction between the two iterations and I’m unclear the increase in cost is worth it.
Regardless, either model is a wonderful choice for a gaming headset. In an increasingly crowded market, the HyperX Cloud nails basically every major category with few significant compromises. I really hope the subsequent model improves around the microphone, however for $80 it’s a steal.
The Cloud Stinger provides solid sound, serious comfort, along with an attractive design for anybody who just demands a “good enough” headset without the wallet-shock.
HyperX’s Cloud headset remains to be our favorite, but the company undercut themselves a bit by releasing the HyperX Cloud Stinger. Listed at $50, it’s one of the cheapest gaming headsets I’ve ever seen from the reputable brand. And it’s good.
Sure, it’s not quite as great as the original Cloud, but for many individuals the Stinger need to do just fine. The plastic chassis lacks a few of the original Cloud’s panache and durability, but looks high-end from a distance and sits pretty slim around the head. HyperX also solved the Cloud’s biggest issue and finally put a volume slider straight at the base in the right earcup and gave it a flip-to-mute microphone, so no longer fiddling within-line controls.
With regards to audio, the Cloud Stinger’s got a great mid-range with virtually no distortion even at high volumes. The treble is underpowered and the bass range is practically nonexistent, but eighty percent for any given game, film, or song should come through clear and clean.
If you already have a reliable headset, specially the original Cloud, I wouldn’t say the Stinger is necessary-own. However if you’re looking for an excellent value on entry-level hardware, this really is it. It’s an insane bargain when comparing it to many other headsets from the same price tier.
At merely under $100, Corsair’s Void Wireless is usually a good wireless headset, but you will come across some compromises.
Frankly speaking, Corsair doesn’t actually have any competition in this particular category. Most decent wireless gaming headsets will run you $150 or maybe more. Corsair’s Void Wireless is priced in a mere $100, which leaves it on its lonesome.
But even accounting for that vacuum, it’s pretty good. Not phenomenal, mind you, but at this price you’re getting a bargain.
I wasn’t really sure what things to make in the Void’s weird, diamond-shaped ear cups but after a little use I’m actually pretty pleased. The Void Wireless sits a bit forward around the head, using the band resting just above your forehead. It will require some becoming accustomed to, but the outcome is less tension around the jaw and a lot more on the rear of the top where it’s less noticeable. I wouldn’t say it’s as comfortable because the more traditional HyperX Cloud, but undoubtedly I like it over its predecessor, the H2100.
The on-headset controls are fairly intuitive, using a volume rocker at the base of your left ear, plus oversized buttons for power and mute about the side. And it’s got 16.8 million color RGB lighting, if that’s your bag.
The greatest design issue is the fact that Void Wireless is heavy. It’s not a problem when sitting up, however if you look down or check out the headset has a tendency to slide around. I don’t know whether it’s due to the battery or perhaps the metal-augmented construction, but your neck gets a workout using this headset.
Sound-wise, the Void Wireless still needs some work. It sounds passable, especially while gaming, but throwing on some music sets the Void Wireless’s limitations into stark relief. The low-end is muddy and distorted, and also the whole range of mid-to-high-end frequencies sounds slick, like you’ve applied too much compression.
You may adjust the headset’s sound in Corsair’s software, but Corsair’s application is still somewhat unwieldy. Superior to just last year, I think, but nevertheless not comparable to Razer, SteelSeries, or Logitech. Also, some users have reported troubles with firmware updates-not a great sign.
“This doesn’t appear to be a tremendously positive review,” you could possibly say. And you’re right, it’s not. The Void Wireless is not an amazing headset, as I said up top. Yet it is the very best wireless gaming headset under $150, and given just how many wires are connected to my PC at virtually any moment, the convenience of cheap wireless might be worth sacrificing a certain amount of audio quality.
Logitech’s G533 doesn’t have quite the same breadth of options as the G933, but a more restrained design along with a bargain price turn this a strong contender for best wireless headset.
It’s a tough call replacing our former mid-tier wireless pick, the Logitech G933, having its sibling-successor the Logitech G533. Like, really tough. The G933 is a great headset, with crisp and well-balanced audio and a few nifty design features (like having the capability to keep the USB dongle inside an earcup).
But I’m still replacing it. Why? Well, aesthetics really are a huge reason. If you need a sign how Logitech’s design language has shifted in the past year roughly, your search is over gam1ngheadset the G933 and G533. The G933 was all sharp angles and science fiction. The G533 on the flip side is sleek, professional, restrained. By using a piano-black finish and soft curves, it looks just like a headset manufactured by Audio-Technica or Sennheiser or a more mainstream audio company-not necessarily a “gaming” headset. I like it.
The G533’s design is also functional. The microphone isn’t as hidden as I’d like, but that’s the only flaw. The headset is lightweight, durable, and fewer vise-grip tight than its predecessor.
Regarding audio fidelity? It’s not quite equal to the G933, although the differences are minimal. The G533 lacks some oomph, especially at lower volumes, as well as its 7.1 support is subpar. Those are hardly reasons to step away, though-a lot of people will run the headset loud enough to counteract the headset’s absence of presence, and virtual 7.1 is (i think) virtually always bad. The G533 is worse in comparison to the average, nevertheless the average is still something I choose in order to avoid everyday.
Whatever the case, the G933 is still offered and is also an absolutely sensible choice for many, particularly if you want console support. The G533 is PC-only, as the G933 may be attached by 3.5mm cable to many other devices. And in case you value comfort over audio fidelity, have a look at the SteelSeries Arctis 7 too-yet another excellent choice.
Astro’s new A50 touts a brand new charging station and controls, yet still doesn’t put out the audio you could expect from a $300 pair of headphones.
SteelSeries Siberia 800 Wireless Dolby 7.1 Gaming Headset
After a new generation of your computer headset and Siberia 800 released in 2016, I assumed we may finally break the tie that’s dominated our splurge headset pick in the past several years.
But once again, there’s no clear winner at that $300 price-though Astro certainly made some strides toward edging out SteelSeries.
The new A50’s biggest improvement is the battery. The brand new model overcomes a lengthy-running weak spot and packs in 12 to 15 hours of life-enough to obtain through a good long day of gaming. Better yet, it features gyroscopes within the ears that allow it to detect whether you’ve set it up down. It automatically shuts off ten seconds later then, after which turns back and connects to your PC on when you pick it support. Its base station also works as a charger, a great mixture of function and beauty.